Mythbusters put dimples on a car to make it like a golf ball. They claimed to have gotten a 14% increase in fuel efficiency. Do you think the result was because they
![It is proven that golf ball surface is superior in terms of aerodynamics. Why F1 cars do not have such patterns on them? Has any team ever played with the surface of It is proven that golf ball surface is superior in terms of aerodynamics. Why F1 cars do not have such patterns on them? Has any team ever played with the surface of](https://preview.redd.it/eawcyjerhon91.png?auto=webp&s=32e75b607ef3825fe488653556c128d167526cc7)
It is proven that golf ball surface is superior in terms of aerodynamics. Why F1 cars do not have such patterns on them? Has any team ever played with the surface of
![VIDEO: Mythbusters test golf ball-like dimpling effect on fuel economy (*Spoiler Alert!*) - Autoblog VIDEO: Mythbusters test golf ball-like dimpling effect on fuel economy (*Spoiler Alert!*) - Autoblog](https://edgecast-img.yahoo.net/mysterio/api/F43F79CEAEFEAD1325AEF18EDCE9A6DD0982745D9AD9C41B3A91C5C265FEE807/autoblog/resizefill_w1200_h720;quality_85;format_webp;cc_31536000;/https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/800x450/format/jpg/quality/85/http://s.aolcdn.com/commerce/blogcdn/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/10/mythbustersdimple_opt.jpg)